Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rithm Capital Corp.
How Rithm Capital Corp. stacks up
RITM · against 133 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #108 of 134 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including RITM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -36.6% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.5% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RITM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RITM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 6.5% | 4.9% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | Not reported | 5.4% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | -36.6% | 6.0% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 133.7% | 91.8% | 76% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RITM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 104 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 29 | 40 | |
| 104 | 4.2B USD | 29 | 18 | |
| 104 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 29 | 39 | |
| 107 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 28 | 53 | |
| 108 | 5.1B USD | 27 | 23 | |
| 109 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 26 | 53 | |
| 110 | 8.8B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 111 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 24 | 26 | |
| 111 | 7.1B CHF (≈$8.2B) | 24 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score