Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RGC · against 334 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #324 of 335 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score85 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including RGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | RGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 329 reported | -0.2% | 2.3% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 330 reported | -0.2% | 4.7% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | Not reported | 0.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 327 reported | 0.0% | 29.6% | 4% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 324 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 0 | 10 | |
| 324 | 1.8B USD | 0 | 30 | |
| 324 | 1.6B USD | 0 | ||
| 324 | 3.6B USD | 0 | ||
| 324 | 3.0B USD | 0 | 11 | |
| 324 | 1.7B USD | 0 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score