Ranked #110 of 157 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
18 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including RGA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 63% of peers. Return on assets: 0.9% vs peer median 1.2%
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 11.0% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RGA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
RGA
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 129 reported
15.9%
10.5%
73%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 18 reported
Not reported
17.2%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 157 reported
0.9%
1.3%
28%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 155 reported
11.7%
12.6%
42%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 162 reported
14.1%
0.0%
61%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
