Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RF · against 132 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 133 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including RF · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | RF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 8.6% | 8.4% | 55% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | Not reported | 9.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | 7.2% | 7.9% | 45% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 71.6% | 70.3% | 50% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score