Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
How Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. stacks up
REXR · against 111 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
36/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #99 of 112 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including REXR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 75% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = REXR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | REXR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 113 reported | 0.5% | 6.7% | 14% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 95 reported | -28.3% | 13.7% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 110 reported | 11.1% | 7.7% | 67% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around REXR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 96 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 39 | 39 | |
| 96 | 5.1B USD | 39 | 23 | |
| 98 | 94.4B HKD (≈$12.1B) | 38 | 52 | |
| 99 | 11.79T KRW (≈$8.5B) | 36 | 32 | |
| 99 | 8.8B USD | 36 | 28 | |
| 101 | 14.0B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 102 | 6.7B USD | 32 | 28 | |
| 102 | 7.1B CHF (≈$8.2B) | 32 | 40 | |
| 104 | 10.1B AUD (≈$6.7B) | 29 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score