Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATRenew Inc.
How ATRenew Inc. stacks up
RERE · against 581 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #139 of 582 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including RERE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RERE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RERE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 7.3% | 4.2% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 593 reported | 14.4% | 9.1% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | Not reported | 7.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 579 reported | 65.8% | 61.1% | 54% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RERE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 139 | 3.7B CNY (≈$512M) | 76 | 57 | |
| 139 | 6.2B CNY (≈$873M) | 76 | 67 | |
| 139 | 5.6B BRL (≈$1.0B) | 76 | 74 | |
| 139 | 1.5B USD | 76 | 45 | |
| 139 | 906M USD | 76 | 80 | |
| 148 | 20.0B TWD (≈$621M) | 75 | 59 | |
| 148 | 137.0B JPY (≈$932M) | 75 | 73 | |
| 148 | 3.9B CNY (≈$540M) | 75 | 61 | |
| 148 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 75 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score