Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
REPX · against 111 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #86 of 112 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including REPX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | REPX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 0.42× | 0.58× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 110 reported | 0.95 | 0.48 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 112 reported | 0.45× | 1.38× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 82 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 37 | |
| 83 | 1.0B USD | 24 | 24 | |
| 84 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 24 | 39 | |
| 85 | 7.1B NOK (≈$678M) | 23 | 28 | |
| 86 | 1.0B USD | 22 | 69 | |
| 87 | 1.9B USD | 21 | 20 | |
| 88 | 670M USD | 17 | 40 | |
| 89 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 17 | 35 | |
| 90 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 16 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score