Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Regency Centers Corporation
How Regency Centers Corporation stacks up
REG · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
73/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #39 of 176 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including REG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = REG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | REG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 3.9% | 2.9% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.5% | 6.1% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | Not reported | 5.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 48.4% | 63.5% | 34% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around REG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 36 | 2.8B USD | 74 | 68 | |
| 36 | 708M USD | 74 | 58 | |
| 36 | 804M USD | 74 | 35 | |
| 39 | 1.6B USD | 73 | 65 | |
| 39 | 14.1B USD | 73 | 69 | |
| 41 | 440M USD | 72 | 64 | |
| 42 | 735M USD | 71 | 44 | |
| 42 | 1.5B USD | 71 | 35 | |
| 44 | 17.2B USD | 70 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score