Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Reformation Inc.
How Reformation Inc. stacks up
REF · against 536 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #453 of 537 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including REF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = REF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | REF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | 1.4% | 4.6% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 548 reported | 2.3% | 9.1% | 15% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | Not reported | 7.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | 53.7% | 60.2% | 45% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around REFScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score