Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Reformation Inc.
How Reformation Inc. stacks up
REF · against 551 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #331 of 552 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score62 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including REF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- Return on assets is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = REF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | REF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 526 reported | 6.1% | 7.4% | 43% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 549 reported | 5.7% | 6.6% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 526 reported | Not reported | 3.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 517 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 553 reported | 61.3% | 30.6% | 90% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around REF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 331 | 5.0B CNY (≈$697M) | 42 | 36 | |
| 331 | 6.7B CNY (≈$932M) | 42 | 59 | |
| 331 | 8.5B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 48 | |
| 331 | 1.3B USD | 42 | 44 | |
| 331 | 1.0B USD | 42 | 36 | |
| 338 | 5.3B HKD (≈$677M) | 41 | 35 | |
| 338 | 1.23T KRW (≈$885M) | 41 | 39 | |
| 338 | 138.1B JPY (≈$939M) | 41 | 58 | |
| 338 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 41 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score