Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Radware Ltd.
How Radware Ltd. stacks up
RDWR · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #88 of 479 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score70 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including RDWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 230.9% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RDWR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RDWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 9.8% | 13.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 230.9% | 22.4% | 87% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 0.9% | 9.7% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RDWR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 88 | 12.2B USD | 89 | 48 | |
| 88 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 65 | |
| 88 | 3.9B USD | 89 | 76 | |
| 88 | 21.1B USD | 89 | 70 | |
| 88 | 1.4B USD | 89 | 55 | |
| 88 | 4.6B USD | 89 | 43 | |
| 99 | 35.5B USD | 88 | 80 | |
| 99 | 7.6B USD | 88 | 69 | |
| 101 | 3.7B USD | 87 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score