Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RadNet, Inc.
How RadNet, Inc. stacks up
RDNT · against 220 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #161 of 221 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including RDNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 3.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: -0.5% vs peer median 1.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 3.2% vs peer median 4.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RDNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RDNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 213 reported | 3.2% | 8.4% | 31% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 202 reported | 3.1% | 11.3% | 24% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 211 reported | -0.5% | 3.6% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 206 reported | 1.5% | 8.0% | 34% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 230 reported | 17.3% | 49.8% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RDNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 4 | 548.2B INR (≈$6.6B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 4 | 170.4B THB (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 70 | |
| 157 | 4.0B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 157 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score