Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RDIB · against 100 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #98 of 101 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including RDIB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RDIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 90 reported | Not reported | 0.24× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 98 reported | 0.84 | 0.57 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 97 reported | 0.23× | 1.55× | 0% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.0B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1.4B HKD (≈$182M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1.2B BRL (≈$211M) | 98 | 89 | |
| 4 | 19.5B JPY (≈$133M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 94 | 134M EUR (≈$147M) | 7 | 45 | |
| 95 | 325M USD | 6 | 46 | |
| 96 | 2.7B CNY (≈$377M) | 6 | 26 | |
| 97 | 303M USD | 6 | 34 | |
| 98 | 240M USD | 4 | 21 | |
| 99 | 257M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 100 | 324M USD | 3 | 25 | |
| 101 | 286M USD | 1 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score