Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RBA · against 226 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #97 of 227 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including RBA · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 223 reported | 0.78× | 0.52× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 220 reported | 0.52 | 0.84 | 76% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 220 reported | 1.31× | 1.45× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 93 | 9.9B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 94 | 103.2B CNY (≈$14.4B) | 42 | 29 | |
| 95 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 42 | 55 | |
| 96 | 19.6B USD | 42 | 61 | |
| 97 | 17.3B USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 98 | 13.4B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 99 | 26.6B USD | 41 | 55 | |
| 100 | 10.2B USD | 41 | 55 | |
| 101 | 102.1B SEK (≈$10.2B) | 41 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score