Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Q2 Holdings, Inc.
How Q2 Holdings, Inc. stacks up
QTWO · against 350 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #205 of 351 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including QTWO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QTWO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QTWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 346 reported | 2.0% | 2.4% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 2.6% | 4.5% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 165 reported | 4.3% | 3.1% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 349 reported | 14.5% | 26.4% | 22% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QTWOScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score