Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Q32 Bio Inc.
How Q32 Bio Inc. stacks up
QTTB · against 321 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 322 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score19 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including QTTB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 94% of peers. Operating margin: 31.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 95% of peers. Return on assets: 14.7% vs peer median 1.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 96% of peers. Return on invested capital: 53.2% vs peer median 4.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QTTB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QTTB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 284 reported | 53.2% | -0.8% | 97% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 301 reported | 31.5% | 2.0% | 97% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 322 reported | 14.7% | -0.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 301 reported | 72.1% | -0.8% | 100% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 338 reported | 73.3% | 37.3% | 82% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QTTB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 98 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 3 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 96 | 84 | |
| 6 | 301M USD | 95 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score