Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qorvo, Inc.
How Qorvo, Inc. stacks up
QRVO · against 240 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #51 of 241 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including QRVO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QRVO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QRVO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 239 reported | 3.8% | 2.8% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 243 reported | 8.4% | 4.5% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 6.4% | 3.2% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 236 reported | 34.5% | 21.2% | 75% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QRVO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 3 | 66.7B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 64 | |
| 43 | 5.7B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 48 | 174.8B TWD (≈$5.4B) | 75 | 46 | |
| 48 | 271.6B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 75 | 45 | |
| 48 | 1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 75 | 64 | |
| 51 | 10.1B USD | 74 | 72 | |
| 52 | 61.3B CNY (≈$8.6B) | 73 | 53 | |
| 52 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 73 | 45 | |
| 54 | 339.4B TWD (≈$10.5B) | 72 | 65 | |
| 54 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 72 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score