Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quantum eMotion Corp.
How Quantum eMotion Corp. stacks up
QNC · against 300 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #297 of 301 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score59 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including QNC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 100% of peers. Operating margin: -98662.6% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -24.6% vs peer median 2.9%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QNC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QNC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 273 reported | Not reported | 2.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 296 reported | -98662.6% | 2.7% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 295 reported | -24.6% | 0.9% | 6% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 286 reported | -45.0% | 3.3% | 9% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 301 reported | 100.0% | 30.0% | 99% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QNC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 297 | 2.1B CNY (≈$292M) | 0 | 2 | |
| 297 | 302M USD | 0 | ||
| 297 | 233M USD | 0 | 17 | |
| 297 | 201M USD | 0 | 20 | |
| 297 | 213M USD | 0 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score