Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to QumulusAI, Inc.
How QumulusAI, Inc. stacks up
QMLS · against 102 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 103 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including QMLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -157.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -39.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QMLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QMLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 95 reported | -157.6% | 1.4% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | -4.8% | 5.9% | 22% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | -39.5% | 2.5% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | -3.2% | 58.3% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QMLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 3 | 6.7B TWD (≈$208M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 3 | 28.2B JPY (≈$192M) | 98 | 56 | |
| 3 | 286M SGD (≈$217M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 77 | 199M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 77 | 219M USD | 10 | 49 | |
| 77 | 233M USD | 10 | 17 | |
| 77 | 159M USD | 10 | 43 | |
| 77 | 118M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 77 | 213M USD | 10 | 37 | |
| 77 | 183M USD | 10 | 29 | |
| 77 | 208M USD | 10 | 22 | |
| 77 | 147M USD | 10 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score