Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qualys, Inc.
How Qualys, Inc. stacks up
QLYS · against 274 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #142 of 275 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score33 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including QLYS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 16.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QLYS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QLYS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 277 reported | 10.4% | 12.0% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 207 reported | 16.5% | 18.2% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 272 reported | 10.3% | 8.5% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QLYS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 138 | 10.4B USD | 62 | 41 | |
| 140 | 26.6B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 60 | 67 | |
| 140 | 863.2B INR (≈$10.4B) | 60 | 78 | |
| 142 | 661.6B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 59 | 59 | |
| 142 | 7.3B USD | 59 | 68 | |
| 144 | 1.26T JPY (≈$8.6B) | 58 | 59 | |
| 145 | 99.8B CNY (≈$14.0B) | 57 | 56 | |
| 145 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 57 | 56 | |
| 145 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 57 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score