Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qualys, Inc.
How Qualys, Inc. stacks up
QLYS · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
59/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #276 of 479 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including QLYS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 16.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QLYS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QLYS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 10.4% | 13.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 16.5% | 22.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 10.3% | 9.7% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QLYS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 271 | 3.4B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 271 | 41.2B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 276 | 397M USD | 59 | 67 | |
| 276 | 283M USD | 59 | 76 | |
| 276 | 7.3B USD | 59 | 68 | |
| 276 | 404M USD | 59 | 57 | |
| 280 | 2.2B USD | 58 | 28 | |
| 280 | 867M USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 280 | 785M USD | 58 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score