Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qiagen N.V.
How Qiagen N.V. stacks up
QGEN · against 147 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
87/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #24 of 148 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including QGEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 87?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 420.9% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QGEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QGEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 148 reported | 5.7% | 10.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 420.9% | 14.1% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 143 reported | -0.8% | 10.9% | 7% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QGEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 5 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 23 | 14.0B USD | 88 | 31 | |
| 24 | 27.5B NZD (≈$16.5B) | 87 | 69 | |
| 24 | 16.8B USD | 87 | 75 | |
| 24 | 20.0B AUD (≈$13.2B) | 87 | 77 | |
| 24 | 10.4B USD | 87 | 70 | |
| 28 | 936.1B JPY (≈$6.4B) | 86 | 80 | |
| 28 | 14.4B USD | 86 | 71 | |
| 30 | 10.7B USD | 85 | 78 | |
| 31 | 10.7B USD | 84 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score