Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qfin Holdings, Inc.
How Qfin Holdings, Inc. stacks up
QFIN · against 85 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 86 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including QFIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Earnings yield: 139.6% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 100% of peers. EBITDA yield: 578.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 100% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 253.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QFIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QFIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 150 reported | 82.9% | 5.4% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 578.2% | 8.0% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | 200.3% | 10.7% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 561.9% | 111.7% | 99% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QFIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 6 | 12.8B THB (≈$359M) | 97 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score