Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qfin Holdings, Inc.
How Qfin Holdings, Inc. stacks up
QFIN · against 120 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #52 of 121 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including QFIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.4% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.9% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QFIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QFIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 136 reported | 11.9% | 3.9% | 62% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 11.4% | -2.3% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 5.1% | 6.8% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QFIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 48 | |
| 5 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 50 | 11.7B THB (≈$328M) | 47 | 53 | |
| 51 | 3.1B CNY (≈$436M) | 45 | 54 | |
| 52 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 43 | 67 | |
| 52 | 331M EUR (≈$364M) | 43 | 33 | |
| 52 | 641M USD | 43 | 74 | |
| 55 | 9.2B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 42 | 39 | |
| 56 | 588M USD | 41 | ||
| 57 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 39 | 67 | |
| 57 | 353M USD | 39 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score