Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to QUALCOMM Incorporated
How QUALCOMM Incorporated stacks up
QCOM · against 42 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
32/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #42 of 43 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including QCOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -17.8% vs peer median 11.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = QCOM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | QCOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 1.9% | 18.8% | 2% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 35 reported | -17.8% | 24.2% | 9% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 4.5% | 14.3% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around QCOM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125.2B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 3 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 4 | 207.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 4 | 259.7B USD | 95 | 63 | |
| 38 | 5.87T TWD (≈$182.0B) | 44 | 46 | |
| 39 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 42 | 74 | |
| 40 | 320.1B USD | 39 | 28 | |
| 41 | 22.73T JPY (≈$154.5B) | 34 | 62 | |
| 42 | 175.6B USD | 32 | 56 | |
| 43 | 148.4B USD | 25 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score