Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qnity Electronics, Inc.
How Qnity Electronics, Inc. stacks up
Q · against 146 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #85 of 147 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including Q · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.3% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = Q, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | Q | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 2.4% | 3.1% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 5.3% | 5.2% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 3.3% | 3.3% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 29.2% | 17.6% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around Q| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 79 | 15.0B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 79 | 13.0B USD | 53 | 68 | |
| 83 | 28.4B USD | 52 | 50 | |
| 83 | 47.7B USD | 52 | 58 | |
| 85 | 24.9B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 86 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 50 | 75 | |
| 86 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 88 | 47.5B USD | 49 | 39 | |
| 89 | 33.0B USD | 48 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score