Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PWR · against 57 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #29 of 58 · scores higher than 51% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including PWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 56 reported | 0.68× | 0.73× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 57 reported | 1.20 | 0.96 | 25% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 57 reported | 1.10× | 1.15× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 101.3B USD | 66 | 65 | |
| 4 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 61 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 60 | 79 | |
| 25 | 74.4B USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 26 | 78.2B USD | 23 | 52 | |
| 27 | 345.9B DKK (≈$51.9B) | 22 | 47 | |
| 28 | 91.8B USD | 21 | 54 | |
| 29 | 98.8B USD | 20 | 47 | |
| 30 | 75.3B USD | 18 | 39 | |
| 31 | 79.3B USD | 18 | 50 | |
| 32 | 92.8B USD | 18 | 45 | |
| 33 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 17 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score