Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ProPetro Holding Corp.
How ProPetro Holding Corp. stacks up
PUMP · against 102 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #58 of 103 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PUMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.5% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.4% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.3% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PUMP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PUMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | -1.5% | 4.7% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 15.9% | 12.1% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | -2.4% | 4.9% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 108.6% | 72.8% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PUMP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 54 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 43 | 39 | |
| 55 | 6.6B CNY (≈$929M) | 42 | 35 | |
| 55 | 665M USD | 42 | 30 | |
| 55 | 448M USD | 42 | 42 | |
| 58 | 882M USD | 41 | 40 | |
| 59 | 921M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 40 | 32 | |
| 60 | 2.2B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 38 | 37 | |
| 61 | 12.7B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 37 | 48 | |
| 62 | 4.1B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 36 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score