Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PubMatic, Inc.
How PubMatic, Inc. stacks up
PUBM · against 607 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #351 of 608 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PUBM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.9% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PUBM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PUBM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 591 reported | -1.8% | 1.8% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 619 reported | 0.4% | 4.0% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 7.3% | 2.3% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 598 reported | 32.6% | 39.8% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PUBM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 4 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 346 | 9.68T IDR (≈$600M) | 38 | 30 | |
| 351 | 1.02T KRW (≈$733M) | 37 | 41 | |
| 351 | 5.6B CNY (≈$790M) | 37 | 28 | |
| 351 | 9.9B SEK (≈$991M) | 37 | 36 | |
| 351 | 736M USD | 37 | 28 | |
| 355 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 36 | 27 | |
| 355 | 4.6B CNY (≈$642M) | 36 | 34 | |
| 355 | 525.6B KRW (≈$378M) | 36 | 35 | |
| 355 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 36 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score