Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
How Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. stacks up
PTEN · against 116 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #73 of 117 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PTEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.0% vs peer median 5.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.0% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.4% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PTEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PTEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | -2.0% | 5.3% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 15.4% | 13.3% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 4.0% | 6.4% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 69.2% | 56.4% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PTEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 4 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 70 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 41 | 31 | |
| 70 | 7.3B USD | 41 | 43 | |
| 72 | 4.9B USD | 40 | 42 | |
| 73 | 42.1B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 39 | 30 | |
| 73 | 4.5B USD | 39 | 44 | |
| 73 | 3.7B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 76 | 44.3B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 38 | 35 | |
| 77 | 5.5B USD | 37 | 51 | |
| 77 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 37 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score