Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Phillips 66
How Phillips 66 stacks up
PSX · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #20 of 32 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PSX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.5% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PSX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PSX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 6.4% | 6.3% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 7.9% | 9.2% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 28 reported | 5.9% | 5.8% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 29.0% | 37.5% | 34% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PSX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 16 | 111.6B USD | 43 | 70 | |
| 17 | 81.0B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 18 | 64.3B USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 18 | 58.3B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 20 | 109.0B USD | 35 | 58 | |
| 21 | 58.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 22 | 163.7B EUR (≈$180.1B) | 33 | 70 | |
| 23 | 66.8B USD | 32 | 49 | |
| 24 | 77.4B USD | 30 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score