Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC
How Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC stacks up
PSNYW · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #335 of 362 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score51 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including PSNYW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -243.5% vs peer median 7.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -18.9% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 98% of peers. Operating margin: -65.0% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PSNYW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PSNYW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | -243.5% | 9.5% | 1% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | -65.0% | 7.1% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | -18.9% | 4.1% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | Not reported | 11.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | -5.7% | 36.0% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PSNYW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 335 | 8.0B USD | 0 | 26 | |
| 335 | 322M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 335 | 2.1B USD | 0 | 3 | |
| 335 | 720M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 335 | 509M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 335 | 19.2B USD | 0 | 29 | |
| 335 | 283M USD | 0 | 48 | |
| 335 | 463M USD | 0 | 26 | |
| 335 | 1M USD | 0 | 3 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score