Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC
How Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC stacks up
PSNY · against 658 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #645 of 659 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score63 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including PSNY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -60.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -2025.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 98% of peers. Operating margin: -65.7% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PSNY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PSNY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 632 reported | -2025.0% | 6.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 657 reported | -65.7% | 5.9% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 626 reported | -60.0% | 2.7% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 616 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 660 reported | -5.7% | 28.3% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PSNY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 645 | 469M USD | 0 | 36 | |
| 645 | 563M USD | 0 | 47 | |
| 645 | 690M USD | 0 | 15 | |
| 645 | 1.2B USD | 0 | 25 | |
| 645 | 720M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 645 | 509M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 645 | 463M USD | 0 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score