Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
How Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. stacks up
PRTH · against 620 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #167 of 621 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score48 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including PRTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 67% of peers. Return on invested capital: 12.8% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 74% of peers. Operating margin: 13.8% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRTH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 582 reported | 12.8% | 3.8% | 76% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 615 reported | 13.8% | 4.1% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 607 reported | 2.2% | 1.5% | 56% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 598 reported | Not reported | 4.1% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 621 reported | 39.4% | 27.1% | 69% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRTH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 167 | 39.4B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 61 | 59 | |
| 167 | 14.2B TWD (≈$439M) | 61 | 51 | |
| 167 | 129.7B JPY (≈$882M) | 61 | 68 | |
| 167 | 16.7B TWD (≈$516M) | 61 | 60 | |
| 167 | 652M USD | 61 | 57 | |
| 172 | 5.1B CNY (≈$711M) | 60 | 64 | |
| 172 | 12.9B TWD (≈$400M) | 60 | 47 | |
| 172 | 6.2B HKD (≈$797M) | 60 | 57 | |
| 172 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 60 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score