Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
How Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. stacks up
PRSU · against 454 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #343 of 455 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including PRSU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRSU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRSU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 451 reported | 2.6% | 5.2% | 29% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 464 reported | 6.6% | 9.6% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 453 reported | 35.1% | 53.9% | 32% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRSU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 343 | 135.3B JPY (≈$920M) | 28 | 56 | |
| 343 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 28 | 44 | |
| 343 | 4.5B AUD (≈$3.0B) | 28 | 54 | |
| 343 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 28 | ||
| 343 | 1.5B USD | 28 | 47 | |
| 343 | 70.7B INR (≈$848M) | 28 | 47 | |
| 343 | 3.1B USD | 28 | 59 | |
| 352 | 8.6B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 27 | 38 | |
| 352 | 5.7B CNY (≈$793M) | 27 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score