Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ProKidney Corp.
How ProKidney Corp. stacks up
PROK · against 427 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #269 of 428 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score160 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PROK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -51.4% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -37.4% vs peer median 0.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -16.5% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PROK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PROK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 414 reported | -51.4% | 0.0% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 432 reported | -16.5% | 3.0% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | -37.4% | -8.4% | 8% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 424 reported | -401.4% | 49.7% | 0% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PROK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 269 | 643M USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 269 | 469M USD | 8 | 45 | |
| 269 | 302M USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 269 | 825M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 269 | 427M USD | 8 | 7 | |
| 269 | 421M USD | 8 | 52 | |
| 269 | 474M USD | 8 | 25 | |
| 269 | 504M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 269 | 388M USD | 8 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score