Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United Parks & Resorts Inc.
How United Parks & Resorts Inc. stacks up
PRKS · against 476 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #81 of 477 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score58 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including PRKS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 69% of peers. Return on assets: 5.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 77% of peers. Return on invested capital: 15.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 91% of peers. Operating margin: 19.2% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRKS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRKS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 453 reported | 15.2% | 8.6% | 81% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 477 reported | 19.2% | 7.3% | 91% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 453 reported | 5.1% | 3.7% | 65% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 443 reported | Not reported | 9.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 479 reported | 46.0% | 31.4% | 75% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRKS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 5 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 81 | 230.2B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 81 | 61 | |
| 81 | 5.5B MYR (≈$1.2B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 81 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 81 | 52 | |
| 81 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 81 | ||
| 81 | 1.5B USD | 81 | 45 | |
| 81 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 81 | 68 | |
| 88 | 6.0B CNY (≈$845M) | 80 | 63 | |
| 88 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 80 | 88 | |
| 88 | 5.6B BRL (≈$1.0B) | 80 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score