Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PRDO · against 210 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 211 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)25 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including PRDO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PRDO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 203 reported | 0.11× | 0.35× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 207 reported | 0.72 | 0.35 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 200 reported | 4.69× | 1.81× | 91% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 176.3B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 31 | 313.0B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 88 | 60 | |
| 32 | 92.3B INR (≈$1.1B) | 86 | 69 | |
| 33 | 4.7B SGD (≈$3.5B) | 86 | 91 | |
| 34 | 7.8B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 86 | 51 | |
| 35 | 1.9B USD | 85 | 85 | |
| 36 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 91 | |
| 37 | 36.93T IDR (≈$2.3B) | 85 | 86 | |
| 38 | 19.8B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 85 | 81 | |
| 39 | 163.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 85 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score