Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PRA Group, Inc.
How PRA Group, Inc. stacks up
PRAA · against 80 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #74 of 81 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PRAA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -35.4% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.7% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PRAA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PRAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | -33.8% | 7.5% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 10.9% | 8.1% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | -5.1% | 12.4% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 139.7% | 112.1% | 76% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PRAA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 71 | 394M USD | 14 | ||
| 72 | 10.8B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 10 | 48 | |
| 73 | 832M USD | 8 | 17 | |
| 74 | 385M USD | 7 | 36 | |
| 74 | 748M USD | 7 | 35 | |
| 76 | 8.6B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 0 | 15 | |
| 76 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 0 | 23 | |
| 76 | 7.0B CNY (≈$985M) | 0 | 12 | |
| 76 | 55.6B JPY (≈$378M) | 0 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score