Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.
How Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. stacks up
PPSI · against 43 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
74/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 44 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including PPSI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 87% of peers. Revenue growth: 20.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PPSI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PPSI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 20.8% | 0.1% | 78% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 14 reported | Not reported | -34.3% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 44 reported | 2.2% | 2.2% | 49% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PPSI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 133M MYR (≈$29M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 41M GBP (≈$54M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 234M BRL (≈$42M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 4 | 266M HKD (≈$34M) | 94 | 87 | |
| 5 | 29M EUR (≈$32M) | 93 | 84 | |
| 6 | 2.9B JPY (≈$19M) | 90 | 94 | |
| 7 | 84M MYR (≈$18M) | 76 | 34 | |
| 8 | 27M USD | 74 | 40 | |
| 9 | 71M MYR (≈$16M) | 73 | 78 | |
| 10 | 204M MYR (≈$45M) | 72 | 73 | |
| 11 | 77M MYR (≈$17M) | 68 | 32 | |
| 12 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 67 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score