Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennantPark Investment Corporation
How PennantPark Investment Corporation stacks up
PNNT · against 62 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 63 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including PNNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on assets: 0.8% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.4% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PNNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PNNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 60 reported | 6.4% | 4.7% | 64% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 33 reported | Not reported | 18.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 71 reported | 0.8% | 2.7% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 69 reported | 2.2% | 5.0% | 31% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 81 reported | 100.0% | 98.3% | 53% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PNNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 97 | 64 | |
| 4 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 87 | 63 | |
| 35 | 402M USD | 35 | ||
| 35 | 322M USD | 35 | ||
| 37 | 2.5B HKD (≈$323M) | 34 | 27 | |
| 38 | 6.8B THB (≈$191M) | 32 | 41 | |
| 38 | 202M USD | 32 | 39 | |
| 40 | 336M USD | 31 | 29 | |
| 41 | 579M AUD (≈$382M) | 29 | 50 | |
| 42 | 90M CHF (≈$103M) | 28 | 35 | |
| 43 | 322M USD | 27 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score