Ranked #97 of 170 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
14 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PNFP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
A mix: stronger book yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.2% vs peer median 7.9%
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 61% of peers. Book yield: 95.4% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PNFP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
PNFP
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 170 reported
7.1%
8.3%
34%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 48 reported
Not reported
8.7%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 91 reported
9.2%
8.2%
56%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 166 reported
90.7%
75.2%
72%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
