Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Platinum Analytics Cayman Ltd
How Platinum Analytics Cayman Ltd stacks up
PLTS · against 467 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
1/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #444 of 468 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score77 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including PLTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 1?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -31.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 97% of peers. Operating margin: -114.4% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -54.2% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 429 reported | -54.2% | 2.7% | 5% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 463 reported | -114.4% | 3.1% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 458 reported | -31.2% | 1.0% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 447 reported | -78.5% | 3.1% | 4% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 468 reported | 64.5% | 27.8% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 444 | 287M USD | 1 | 53 | |
| 444 | 336M USD | 1 | 45 | |
| 444 | 159M USD | 1 | 43 | |
| 444 | 2.8B NOK (≈$270M) | 1 | 47 | |
| 444 | 316M USD | 1 | 37 | |
| 444 | 6.2B SEK (≈$619M) | 1 | 37 | |
| 444 | 216M EUR (≈$238M) | 1 | 16 | |
| 444 | 208M USD | 1 | 22 | |
| 444 | 190M USD | 1 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score