Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Planet Fitness, Inc.
How Planet Fitness, Inc. stacks up
PLNT · against 312 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #171 of 313 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PLNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 311 reported | 5.3% | 5.4% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 317 reported | 8.6% | 9.6% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 6.3% | 6.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 315 reported | -14.8% | 43.4% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 171 | 29.7B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 171 | 322.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 50 | 54 | |
| 171 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 171 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 171 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 176 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 49 | 68 | |
| 176 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 | |
| 176 | 3.2B USD | 49 | 46 | |
| 176 | 3.0B USD | 49 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score