Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
How Platinum Group Metals Ltd. stacks up
PLG · against 91 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #66 of 92 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PLG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.2% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.9% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | -3.1% | 0.4% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 104 reported | -4.9% | 2.2% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | -5.9% | -3.1% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | 59.3% | 103.0% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 3 | 3.7B THB (≈$103M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 3 | 7.8B THB (≈$219M) | 98 | 89 | |
| 3 | 7.0B THB (≈$196M) | 98 | 89 | |
| 66 | 311M SAR (≈$84M) | 8 | 31 | |
| 66 | 493M BRL (≈$89M) | 8 | 38 | |
| 66 | 2.3B THB (≈$64M) | 8 | 26 | |
| 66 | 155M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 66 | 124M USD | 8 | ||
| 66 | 162M USD | 8 | ||
| 66 | 284M CAD (≈$208M) | 8 | ||
| 66 | 166M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 66 | 156M CAD (≈$114M) | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score