Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Prologis, Inc.
How Prologis, Inc. stacks up
PLD · against 5 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
76/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #3 of 6 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score1 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including PLD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 4.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 75% of peers. Operating margin: 54.7% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 84% of peers. Return on assets: 4.2% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 6 reported | 4.5% | 4.8% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 6 reported | 54.7% | 33.3% | 100% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 6 reported | 4.2% | 3.9% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 6 reported | 7.7% | 9.2% | 40% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 6 reported | 75.5% | 65.4% | 80% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.3B USD | 93 | 56 | |
| 2 | 87.3B USD | 92 | 55 | |
| 3 | 125.5B USD | 76 | 48 | |
| 4 | 100.1B USD | 62 | 44 | |
| 5 | 173.8B USD | 32 | 50 | |
| 6 | 68.1B USD | 22 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score