Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PLAB · against 493 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #68 of 494 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)47 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including PLAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PLAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 480 reported | 0.00× | 0.22× | 98% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 475 reported | 1.32 | 0.79 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 489 reported | 4.94× | 1.83× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 64 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 87 | 81 | |
| 65 | 13.1B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 87 | 35 | |
| 66 | 16.5B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 87 | 75 | |
| 67 | 8.3B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 87 | 63 | |
| 68 | 1.7B USD | 86 | 78 | |
| 69 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 86 | 35 | |
| 70 | 34.6B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 86 | 69 | |
| 71 | 126.3B JPY (≈$859M) | 86 | 81 | |
| 72 | 120.9B INR (≈$1.5B) | 85 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score