Ranked #1 of 219 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
34 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including PJT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on equity, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 98% of peers. Return on assets: 11.4% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 98% of peers. Return on equity: 37.6% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PJT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
PJT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 199 reported
63.1%
10.9%
92%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 35 reported
21.2%
13.3%
62%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 219 reported
11.4%
1.3%
97%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 216 reported
37.6%
11.2%
98%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 228 reported
95.3%
0.0%
95%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
