Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PIPR · against 235 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #179 of 236 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including PIPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | PIPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 241 reported | 6.6% | 7.7% | 37% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | Not reported | 10.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 10.4% | 8.4% | 63% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 236 reported | 30.8% | 77.4% | 14% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 1 | 21.3B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2.4B USD | 97 | 64 | |
| 5 | 54.2B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 175 | 6.4B CHF (≈$7.4B) | 21 | 24 | |
| 175 | 5.1B CHF (≈$5.9B) | 21 | 57 | |
| 175 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 21 | 18 | |
| 179 | 28.2B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 20 | 50 | |
| 179 | 4.7B USD | 20 | 66 | |
| 181 | 31.6B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 18 | 46 | |
| 181 | 5.3B USD | 18 | 24 | |
| 181 | 3.6B USD | 18 | 19 | |
| 181 | 543.4B INR (≈$6.5B) | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score