Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PH · against 47 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 48 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | PH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 3.0% | 3.3% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 4.4% | 5.7% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 3.3% | 3.4% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 47 reported | 12.9% | 15.0% | 46% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 2 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 79 | 79 | |
| 3 | 71.0B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 4 | 92.9B USD | 60 | 41 | |
| 5 | 75.3B USD | 57 | 39 | |
| 30 | 118.1B EUR (≈$129.9B) | 38 | 60 | |
| 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 66.8B USD |
| 38 |
| 57 |
| 30 | 91.8B USD | 38 | 54 |
| 34 | 92.8B USD | 37 | 45 |
| 35 | 119.2B USD | 36 | 51 |
| 35 | 73.1B USD | 36 | 47 |
| 37 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 35 | 59 |
| 38 | 65.8B USD | 33 | 60 |
| 39 | 179.5B USD | 31 | 35 |